# The ledger's debt, in a tracked file so a change to it is a diff a reviewer
# sees. An environment variable would not be: PGC_SKIP_TIMING is the precedent,
# set in two workflow files, suppressing whole suites for months with no diff
# ever showing it.
#
# THE TWO NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT KINDS OF THING. The first version of this file
# treated both as ceilings and deadlocked, so the distinction is written down.
#
# suites_not_covered -- A CEILING, and monotone.
# Registered suites with no rows in the ledger at all. Their checks are
# invisible to the gate: it cannot refuse a new check in a suite it has never
# seen. It falls as suites are seeded, and it MAY ONLY FALL -- the gate compares
# this value against the previously committed one and refuses an increase, so
# widening the debt is an edit a reviewer sees AND a gate refuses.
#
# Adding a check to a suite that is already covered does not move it, which is
# what makes it safe to bound.
suites_not_covered 249
#
# checks_never_observed_red -- A CENSUS. NOT a ceiling, and it must not become
# one.
# Every new check enters the ledger as `never`, so bounding this number means
# every added check breaks the gate, and the only way to land one is to raise a
# number the design says may only fall. That is a deadlock rather than a budget,
# and the first version of this file shipped it: 614 rows, 614 never, ceiling
# 614.
#
# It is reported by the gate on every run and falls as checks are attacked. What
# the gate REFUSES is a check the ledger has never seen, which regenerating the
# ledger fixes -- a reviewable one-line diff, and the intended action rather
# than a forbidden one.
#
# The number here is ASSERTED to match the committed ledger, in both harnesses.
# Without that it is a hand-maintained count that drifts, which is the failure
# this repository has spent a day proving. It is not a ceiling; it is a
# measurement that must be true.
#
# HOW TO RE-DERIVE IT, written here because a changelog entry got it wrong and a
# derivation is only useful where the number is:
#
# awk -F'\t' '$5=="never"' test/check_ledger.tsv | wc -l
#
# FIELD FIVE, and it said four until #1040. The command is only useful if it
# runs, and `$4` returned 0 on the shipped tree: #1010 inserted the majors a row
# claims as field 4, so the last-red moved to field 5 and the old form read a
# major where it expected a date. The CHANGELOG entry for #1010 says this file
# carries the corrected form; it did not, which is why the claim is worth as
# little as the recipe. Corrected here rather than filed because this change
# moves the number below, and a reviewer re-deriving it with the printed command
# would have got 0 against a stated 1198.
#
# Rows whose LAST-RED is `never`, not the row count. The two agree only while
# nothing has ever been observed red, so a plain `grep -c` overcounts by exactly
# the number of attacked checks -- and it overcounts from the first moment this
# ledger does the job it exists for. The gate prints both quantities side by side
# (`rows=N | never observed red=M`) because they are different questions.
# MERGED: this branch derived 1211 and #1070 derived 1220, each correct for a tree
# that is not this one. Neither survives. Re-derived by COUNTING on the merged tree,
# which is the only resolution this number has:
# awk -F'\t' '$5=="never"' test/check_ledger.tsv | wc -l
checks_never_observed_red 1268